Comments on: Gillmor Gang 07.02.08 http://gillmorgang.techcrunch.com/2008/07/02/gillmor-gang/ Industry experts and thought leaders mix it up in The Gillmor Gang's daily conversation on what's hot in technology and social media. Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:37:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: Joseph Holsten http://gillmorgang.techcrunch.com/2008/07/02/gillmor-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-997 Joseph Holsten Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:09:38 +0000 http://gillmorgang.techcrunch.com/?p=202#comment-997 I love how XMPP got transcribed as Accent PT. I love how XMPP got transcribed as Accent PT.

]]> By: scott http://gillmorgang.techcrunch.com/2008/07/02/gillmor-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-986 scott Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:04:20 +0000 http://gillmorgang.techcrunch.com/?p=202#comment-986 Chris briefly mentioned FriendFeed rooms at the beginning of the hash pipe discussion but did not really follow through to expand on why he brought up rooms. I believe a gap-fire room could be more effective than building some hack on top of Twitter. The issues raised seem to be about comment portability. This got me thinking that what is needed is the standardization of comment feeds. If every social object had a globally unique identified (GUID), then 3rd party comment feeds could be imported, attached to and aggregated against entries within social object feeds. I believe that both RSS and Atom supports URIs for this purpose so it does not seem that it would be a lot of work for FriendFeed to support this functionality. I don't think Twitter can or will get there from here any time soon since Twitter entries appear to be locked into a stream model. If they tried to restructure their data model as a feed of feeds model then they would move away from a messaging model and stop being Twitter. Chris briefly mentioned FriendFeed rooms at the beginning of the hash pipe discussion but did not really follow through to expand on why he brought up rooms. I believe a gap-fire room could be more effective than building some hack on top of Twitter.

The issues raised seem to be about comment portability. This got me thinking that what is needed is the standardization of comment feeds. If every social object had a globally unique identified (GUID), then 3rd party comment feeds could be imported, attached to and aggregated against entries within social object feeds. I believe that both RSS and Atom supports URIs for this purpose so it does not seem that it would be a lot of work for FriendFeed to support this functionality.

I don’t think Twitter can or will get there from here any time soon since Twitter entries appear to be locked into a stream model. If they tried to restructure their data model as a feed of feeds model then they would move away from a messaging model and stop being Twitter.

]]> By: henry http://gillmorgang.techcrunch.com/2008/07/02/gillmor-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-968 henry Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:37:03 +0000 http://gillmorgang.techcrunch.com/?p=202#comment-968 Hey Bruno. Sorry for the error. It's fixed now. Hey Bruno. Sorry for the error. It’s fixed now.

]]> By: Bruno Pedro http://gillmorgang.techcrunch.com/2008/07/02/gillmor-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-967 Bruno Pedro Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:01:32 +0000 http://gillmorgang.techcrunch.com/?p=202#comment-967 Hi, great transcription of the conversation. Nevertheless I have to make a correction: instead of "Bruno Patrio", Chris Messina was referring to me, "Bruno Pedro". Thank you Hi, great transcription of the conversation.

Nevertheless I have to make a correction: instead of “Bruno Patrio”, Chris Messina was referring to me, “Bruno Pedro”.

Thank you

]]> By: Самые привлекательные для инвестиций города http://gillmorgang.techcrunch.com/2008/07/02/gillmor-gang/comment-page-1/#comment-961 Самые привлекательные для инвестиций города Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:52:40 +0000 http://gillmorgang.techcrunch.com/?p=202#comment-961 [...] Gillmor Gang [...] [...] Gillmor Gang [...]

]]>